Problems Interior / SCC K-104
K-104

Generic $C^2$- or Lipschitz-inextendibility of near-Kerr MGHDs

Open Classical frontier Open in literature Mostly scoped Interior / SCC Pure math FV: medium
Near-Kerr (vacuum) Asymptotically flat Vacuum Full Einstein InteriorNonlinear

Summary

Generic $C^2$- or Lipschitz-inextendibility of near-Kerr MGHDs

Why this matters

This is the strongest currently plausible version of SCC for Kerr-type interiors.

Exact scope

Background / setting
Asymptotically flat four-dimensional general relativity unless the statement specifies otherwise. Cauchy horizon / interior regularity formulations of strong cosmic censorship are in play; distinguish $C^0$ vs higher regularity notions.
Equation type
PDE level: full-einstein.
Linearity
Includes or emphasizes nonlinear dynamics.
Regularity
State intended regularity class for extensions across horizons explicitly (e.g. $C^0$, Lipschitz, $C^2$).
Parameter regime
Subextremal Kerr interior up to Cauchy horizons; specify SCC regularity class ($C^0$, Lipschitz, $C^k$) in the theorem.
Asymptotics
asymptotically-flat
Gauge / formulation
State gauge/fixing class compatible with cited stability or interior programs (e.g. generalized harmonic, double-null interior charts).

Status explanation

Entry imported without two independent bibliographic pointers in this repository; treat theorem-level claims as unverified here.

Problem statement

Show that although $C^0$ extensions can exist, generic near-Kerr vacuum developments admit no extension with enough regularity to preserve a meaningful Einstein evolution across the Cauchy horizon.

What is already known

  • $C^0$-extendibility and weak regularity across Cauchy horizons are understood in substantial $Lambda=0$ vacuum settings (Dafermos–Luk program); higher regularity and $Lambda>0$ charged models require separate hypotheses.
    Regime: Dynamical vacuum near Kerr, $Lambda=0$ baseline; contrast with $Lambda>0$ scalar scans.
    Sets what “partial” interior control means before claiming generic blow-up or extendibility.
  • Linear scalar and Teukolsky-type decay on fixed subextremal Kerr exteriors is highly developed and feeds conditional interior instability heuristics.
    Regime: Linearized fields on exact Kerr/Kerr–Newman.
    Supplies quantitative decay exponents used in bridge hypotheses to inner horizons.
  • Polyhomogeneous/null-infinity technology exists for nonlinear Minkowski and some linearized Kerr contexts; sharp nonlinear near-Kerr peeling is not packaged as one theorem.
    Regime: Null infinity / linearized models.
    Separates radiation asymptotics from interior SCC targets.

Progress summary: Partial progress exists in adjacent regimes;

What remains open

A complete answer must specify the regularity class, prove generic blow-up of the corresponding geometric quantity, and rule out every extension in that class.

Mathematical prerequisites

Curvature lower bounds; regularity comparison; extension theory; blow-up of connection or curvature invariants.

Completion criteria

A complete answer must specify the regularity class, prove generic blow-up of the corresponding geometric quantity, and rule out every extension in that class.

Implications if solved

Would restore deterministic predictability at the correct mathematical regularity level.

Formal verification suitability

FV: medium

Some subquestions may formalize before the full statement.

See Formal verification for how this database uses these labels.

References

Related by shared tags

Heuristic matches on family, cluster, equation level, asymptotics, and relevance.

  • K-610 — Establish sharp SCC thresholds in Kerr interiors for C0 vs C1 vs C2 formulations.
  • K-611 — Prove generic Lipschitz (or C1) inextendibility of near-Kerr MGHDs.
  • K-615 — Show that small vacuum perturbations of Kerr produce weak null singularities generically at the Cauchy horizon.
  • K-631 — Prove a unified framework for gauge choices in nonlinear black-hole stability compatible with $\mathcal{I}^+$ expansions and interior analysis.
  • K-643 — Establish a sharp criterion for when Kerr interior admits C0 extension vs stronger regularity failure (in terms of horizon tails).
  • K-644 — Prove a full nonlinear characteristic IVP theorem from event-horizon data to the interior boundary in near-Kerr vacuum.

Editorial / maintainer notes

Open: no complete theorem matching the statement is currently recorded on this site. : tighten if community consensus differs.


Last updated: 2026-04-05 · Last verified (editorial): 2026-04-06 (bulk-editorial-fixes) · Edit on GitHub →