Problems Exterior Stability K-011
K-011

Spin fields on dynamical near-Kerr backgrounds

Open Classical frontier Open in literature Mostly scoped Exterior Stability Pure math FV: medium
Near-Kerr (vacuum) Asymptotically flat Vacuum Stationary reduction ExteriorNonlinearLinear

Summary

Spin fields on dynamical near-Kerr backgrounds

Why this matters

Nonlinear Einstein proofs require estimates on fields propagating on dynamical, not exactly stationary, backgrounds.

Exact scope

Background / setting
Asymptotically flat four-dimensional general relativity unless the statement specifies otherwise.
Equation type
PDE level: stationary-reduction.
Linearity
Includes or emphasizes nonlinear dynamics.
Regularity
Smooth / Sobolev classes as in the problem statement; tighten when citing a specific theorem.
Parameter regime
Subextremal Kerr moduli $|a|<M$ (or stated KN/KdS extension); smallness measured in the stability topology on Cauchy data.
Asymptotics
asymptotically-flat
Gauge / formulation
State gauge/fixing class compatible with cited stability or interior programs (e.g. generalized harmonic, double-null interior charts).

Status explanation

Entry imported without two independent bibliographic pointers in this repository; treat theorem-level claims as unverified here.

Problem statement

Prove robust decay and Morawetz estimates for spin 1 and spin 2 fields on time-dependent metrics that stay close to Kerr within a nonlinear bootstrap regime.

What is already known

  • Nonlinear stability of vacuum Kerr is proved for sufficiently small $|a|/M$ (Klainerman–Szeftel).
    Regime: Nonlinear Einstein vacuum, asymptotically flat, small angular momentum per unit mass.
    Strongest unconditional nonlinear theorem toward the full subextremal conjecture.
  • Linearized Teukolsky/wave decay and mode stability on fixed subextremal Kerr are developed in depth (microlocal and physical-space methods).
    Regime: Linearized gravity and scalar waves on exact Kerr.
    Standard toolbox; not equivalent to nonlinear stability for all parameters.
  • Sharp Price-law exponents and nonlinear tail matching are understood in restricted settings (e.g. linearized models, Schwarzschild); sharp nonlinear Kerr curvature tails are not settled.
    Regime: Late-time asymptotics; mixed linear vs nonlinear literature.
    Locates what “sharp Price law” demands beyond integrated decay.

Progress summary: Partial progress exists in adjacent regimes;

What remains open

A complete answer must give coercive estimates compatible with nonlinear closure and quantify all losses due to the time-dependent background.

Mathematical prerequisites

Physical-space decay without exact separability; perturbative microlocal analysis; nonstationary commutator methods.

Completion criteria

A complete answer must give coercive estimates compatible with nonlinear closure and quantify all losses due to the time-dependent background.

Implications if solved

Would remove a major technical bottleneck between linear theory and a full nonlinear Kerr theorem.

Formal verification suitability

FV: medium

Some subquestions may formalize before the full statement.

See Formal verification for how this database uses these labels.

References

Related by shared tags

Heuristic matches on family, cluster, equation level, asymptotics, and relevance.

  • K-001 — Full nonlinear stability of subextremal Kerr
  • K-004 — Peeling and polyhomogeneous expansions at null infinity for nonlinear near-Kerr evolutions
  • K-009 — Einstein–massive Klein–Gordon near Kerr: classification of stable and unstable regimes
  • K-012 — Low-regularity Kerr stability threshold
  • K-013 — Formation plus relaxation to Kerr
  • K-601 — Prove unconditional linear stability of Kerr (full subextremal range) in a fixed gauge, with full decay rates.
  • K-602 — Prove nonlinear stability of Kerr for the full subextremal range |a|<M.
  • K-604 — Establish a sharp peeling/polyhomogeneity theorem at future null infinity ($\mathcal{I}^+$) for nonlinear near-Kerr evolutions.

Editorial / maintainer notes

Partial: substantial adjacent results or special cases exist, but the statement as written is not fully settled. : replace with a precise description of what is proved vs. conjectured.


Last updated: 2026-04-05 · Last verified (editorial): 2026-04-06 (bulk-editorial-fixes) · Edit on GitHub →